Shoud the United States pay 50-200 billion a year as "climate reparations" to China, India, Africa, etc?
Posted on 2009 under Uncategorized | 12 Comments16 Dec
What’s the worst thing on the table at the U.N. Climate Control Conference in Copenhagen from December 7 to December 18? If you guessed cap-and-tax, you’re wrong. The reparations could be much, much worse.
The draft of the treaty encompasses 181 pages and recites that it shall be the obligation of developed countries (Europe, United States, Japan, Australia, etc.) to pay the developing countries (China, India, Africa, etc.) huge reparations in the form of annual sums to erase poverty and to share technology. Australian lawyer Janet Albrechtsen explains the most recent draft of the treaty:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/climate_treaty_reparations_would_cost_50-200bn_per_year.html
"The major countries are putting together a fund to help poor countries deal with the cost of anti-pollution technology"
So we get a deficit, and these "poor" countries get money and technology.
"The major countries are putting together a fund to help poor countries deal with the cost of anti-pollution technology"
China is poor?
You won’t get the liberals to believe this.
They are such lemmings they can’t understand what the hell is happening to our country.
Mail this postPopularity: 1% [?]
by Pax Romana, on December 27 2009 @ 10:43 am
Nope.
References :
by prouddaddy, on December 27 2009 @ 10:57 am
sure why not. It’s not going to be worth anything anyway. pay them in dollars. not in gold or anything else. pay them in Obama money. The new $1,000,000 bill. with his face on it. that would be perfect.
References :
by Thank you Blue Dogs, on December 27 2009 @ 11:04 am
That’s what it comes down to, a whole bunch of 3rd world counties looking for handouts when we already give them more money than anyone else , with these people you give them a inch and they will try to take a mile,
hell no
References :
by NO Bama, on December 27 2009 @ 11:20 am
HELL NO.
References :
by tomhale138, on December 27 2009 @ 12:08 pm
Well, we pay china more than that each year just in junk we buy at walmart. I think, not having read the article I admit, that there will be strings attached to the money, they will have to use it to buy technology and equipment from us. The more money they have, the more investment in us, the better it is for everyone. Its a long term goal for the good of everyone, including us, and its nothing more or less than we have been doing, poorly, in foreign aid for years and years now.
References :
by whimsy, on December 27 2009 @ 12:55 pm
That is why we have summits with negotiations and agreements. Obviously, no one is going to pay these folks money like that…
References :
by Miles from Michigan!, on December 27 2009 @ 1:33 pm
Hey, we’re rich, right? The rest of the world will expect us to pick up the tab! We do with everything else!
If things go over that than we simply raise taxes!!
References :
by Louis Cyphre ®, on December 27 2009 @ 1:58 pm
Hmm… borrow money from China so that we can pay them and others reparations? Meanwhile, money to Africa and India helps to create their emerging markets for cheap Chinese goods? Then our ethnic "minorities" become pluralities, and our crushing debt turns the USA into the Third-World nations that were formerly India and Africa? I’m sure the so-called "American" President will be all for it.
References :
by tracer, on December 27 2009 @ 2:13 pm
You won’t get the liberals to believe this.
They are such lemmings they can’t understand what the hell is happening to our country.
References :
by Agent Orange, on December 27 2009 @ 3:02 pm
The major countries are putting together a fund to help poor countries deal with the cost of anti-pollution technology.
The US is not the only ones paying into it, the ones you mentioned are too.
That’s all Rush Jr..
References :
by Docker, on December 27 2009 @ 3:24 pm
climate reparations to China, they are 100 times worse than the US with emissions.
References :
by † Thorae †, on December 27 2009 @ 4:10 pm
No.. But with the guy we have in office right now, you never know…
References :