Comments on: In Copenhagen we are NEGOTIATING whether there was actually global warming?

By: sailor8

sailor8 — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:23:59 +0000

They are not debating if there is a Global Warming. They are debating what we are going to do about Global Warming. This shows that all the Head n the Sand people are lost and wandering around in the dark already.
References :

By: starleo51

starleo51 — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:04:59 +0000

as predicted there would be a tax revolt worldwide..then the globalist would insist a new world order under the command of those non-elected officials.
References :

By: James E

James E — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:32:59 +0000

Problem really is the world is really cooling down fairly rapidly for the last 3 years to the point real scientists not retarded liberals are becoming seriously concerned about just how cold this unexpected solar minimum is going to get. The discussion I have heard from some I know is we are heading for a solar minimum at least as deep as the Dalton minimum of 1790 through 1820 when they had ice skating parties on the Thames in London at easter. But there are many others who feel that a Maunder minimum is more likely because the sun is shut down to a much lower level than ever happened at the Dalton minimum. Most of those with the greatest experience feel though that it is likely we have come to the end of the warm interglacial period and possibly are returning to full ice age conditions. The biggest problem though is that the most liberal democrats have enriched themselves through direct fraud while preventing the construction of solar power and agricultural satellites that could have powered the entire world and provided the food for a large part of the world population just so they could make more profits from selling coal and oil.

Some scientific information revealing the truth about global warming, when it happened and what probably caused it. And as well how many years, centuries or millennia it might be before the world warms up again from the coming ice age.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:0Master_Past_20000yrs_temperatures_icecore_Vostok_150dpi.png
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/global_warming.html
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html
http://reasonmclucus.tripod.com/CO2myth.html
http://mc-computing.com/qs/Global_Warming/Atmospheric_Analysis.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_variation
Where the heat came from and why it was abnormally cold previously
http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~dbunny/research/global/215.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_minimum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_Minimum
References :

By: andy

andy — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:27:59 +0000

Actually what they are arguing is whether man is driving this round of climate change or just adding to it. For most of the people, it is more about punishing the United States and Europe then making real changes. You would think that they would focus on the top 5 contributors but since three of the top four are India, Russia, and China don’t hold your breath. Also, China is the #1 total emitter of greenhouse gases and has said it may do something after the United States and Europe reduce their emissions by around 80%.

If this was really a man made problem wouldn’t you want to reduce across the board ALL emissions from ALL sources?

On last thought, if we started measuring temperatures at the end of Winter and it is late Spring don’t you think that the average temperatures would be increasing? That is what we have been doing since most of the recorded history has been from around the 1850′s to today and we left the period called the Little Ice Age sometime around 1850.
References :